
ISSUE
ANALYSIS No. 12
Series
of 2008
MoA
on Ancestral Domain: It’s Not Over, Yet
By
the Policy Study, Publication, and Advocacy
Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG)
August 5, 2008
The
Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) on Ancestral Domain between the Philippine
government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) does not
automatically bind the Arroyo government to honor the territorial
claim of the Bangsamoro people in Mindanao, Palawan, and Sulu. If
there is any clear commitment made by the Philippine government
based on the MoA, it is on explicit assurances that under any final
accord with the MILF the property rights and investments of big
landowners, transnational corporations, and foreign powers that
are formalized in a myriad of agreements and treaties will be protected.
As
to the ancestral domain, territories and resources, and authority
of the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE) – all of these are
subject to the yet-to-be cobbled Comprehensive Compact due in November
2009, a plebiscite, and charter change which are foreseen to be
acrimonious and drawn-out in the coming years.
The
MoA
on Ancestral Domain, a by-product of a series of peace talks
and agreements between the Arroyo government and the MILF since
2001, was to be signed by both parties on August 5 in Malaysia where
the talks are being hosted by the Kuala Lumpur government. It was
stopped by a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued August 4 by
the Supreme Court (SC) acting on a petition filed against the MoA
by local executives and politicians in Mindanao.
The
MoA was hastily put together under instructions made to the government
panel by Malacanang to come up with an agreement which the President
would show as her “legacy of peace” during her State-of-the-Nation
Address on July 28. A temporary deadlock in the talks changed all
that, however. But the paper had to be drafted anyway by both parties
under pain of losing the International Monitoring Team (IMT). Malaysia,
which heads the IMT that is overseeing a ceasefire, had threatened
to end the team’s tour of duty on August 31 unless progress
is made in the talks.
Secrecy
The
street protests generated by the agreement particularly in Mindanao
this week were inevitable in a peace process shrouded with secrecy.
Although the positions of both government and MILF on the issues
under negotiation have been well-publicized, the contents of the
MoA were kept under wraps until a former AFP general privy to the
peace talks reportedly leaked the document to test the waters, so
to speak.
Basically,
the MoA is a set of consensus points forged together by the two
negotiating panels in the roadmap to peace that will culminate in
the Comprehensive Compact. The next discussions after the MoA signing
will prove to be more contentious as both sides tackle the specifics
of the territorial and maritime resources claimed by the MILF covering,
aside from the expanded Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM),
about 1,000 barangays (villages). Other discussions are on the mechanics
and modalities of the BJE; the final scheduling of the local plebiscite
among peoples including indigenous peoples and other non-Muslims
covered by the Bangsamoro homeland; and, finally, amending the charter
to establish a new federal system (with the Bangsamoro as a federated
state) and parliamentary government that will be ratified nationwide
in a second plebiscite.
Now
that the contents of the MoA are out, with many pressure groups
in Mindanao calling it a “sell-out,” the next negotiations
should anticipate a storm of fireworks and a possible derailment.
The tit-for-tat in the SC dealing on the MoA’s constitutional
implications would be interesting to observe. Knowing, however,
the high court’s well-established deference to the chief executive’s
policy imperatives, it will likely rule in favor of the government
no matter the insurmountable political backlash it would create.
But should the MoA, in the first place, be considered as a breakthrough
in the Bangsamoro people’s historic struggle for self-determination?
A closer scrutiny of the unsigned agreement reveals that while the
Philippine government pledges to recognize the ancestral domain
claim of the Bangsamoro people in motherhood principles it appends
several conditions. Among others, the conditions are: First, it
exempts territories covered by “government projects or any
other voluntary dealings entered into by the government and private
individuals, corporate entities, or institutions.” Second,
although the BJE has jurisdiction and control over potential sources
of energy including oil and natural gas, these will remain under
the operation of the central government “in times of national
emergency” or “when public interest so requires.”
Third, although the autonomous Bangsamoro government may engage
in economic and trade relations with other countries, the central
government reserves its jurisdiction on “external defense.”
Excluded
As formulated, these conditions effectively exempt from the ancestral
domain and BJE authority the mining, forest, and other resource
areas covered by existing laws, executive agreements, and policies
in favor of foreign corporations, local landowners, and other non-Muslim
stakeholders. Likewise, the central government can always invoke
“emergency situation” and “national interest”
to exercise authority over energy resources.
Moreover, the presence of foreign military forces is also guaranteed
in pursuit of the central government’s “external defense”
responsibility. The presence of U.S. troops, special operations
forces, basing facilities, and surveillance systems in Moro-dominated
areas and waters is guaranteed by the Visiting Forces Agreement
(VFA) and other agreements signed secretly by Arroyo with the U.S.
government since 2002 which the MoA implicitly honors.
Arroyo officials claim that the President aims to sustain the momentum
of the peace process with the MILF until her term ends in June 2010.
Critics and anti-Arroyo opposition groups are wary, however, that
the peace talks are being calibrated to justify charter change en
route to Arroyo’s extending her power as prime minister under
a federal cum parliamentary system that will also formalize the
Bangsamoro homeland as a federated state. Considering that anti-Arroyo
opposition groups are all gears for the 2010 elections, the Malacanang
agenda will likely end up as another debacle akin to the fate suffered
by her two previous attempts.
The
MILF, on the other hand, views the MoA as a step forward for its
goal of self-determination. Its leaders can always invoke the general
concepts and principles of the MoA on Ancestral Domain to pursue
the MILF’s political goal more so if they choose to declare
unilaterally a separate state later on.
But
they should be pragmatic enough to learn from the mistakes of the
MNLF when, its armed strength weakened by strategic setbacks and
factionalism, and abandoned by its foreign backers, it forged a
final peace accord 12 years ago that yielded neither real autonomy
nor effective political authority and development for the Bangsamoro
people. Ever incremental in their objectives, the MoA – for
that matter the peace talks with Arroyo – is an incidental
part of the MILF’s 50-year jihad that its leaders declared
in 2000. MILF ground forces continue to train and hold on to their
arms knowing that their struggle for self-determination includes
fighting and negotiating.
The
strong backlash ignited by the MoA deserves a second look by the
MILF leaders. A lesson that can be drawn is the fact that the war
for self-determination involves not only taking arms and talking
but also a political war to win the broadest support for the just
and historic struggle of the Bangsamoro people. A lot of hard work
needs to be done in this area.

Home
/ Programs and Projects / About
us / Contact us / Site
map / Partners / Links
Telefax +6329299526 email: cenpeg@cenpeg.org; cenpeg.info@gmail.com;
cenpeg2k4@yahoo.com
Copyright 2005 Center for People Empowewrment in Governance (CenPEG),
Philippines. All rights reserved |